I didn’t fall asleep until 4:00 a.m on Monday morning. My sleep schedule was screwed up from the weekend and I was extremely restless thinking about my direction with poker. I survived Monday in zombie mode on 3 hours of sleep, but I feel ok now.
Overview of Play
I’m really questioning my path online and want to lay things out here as much as I can. I know I don’t have a profitable “playing style” in comparison to the elite short-stackers at my stakes. I think I’m at a level going forward to play around break mass tabling in a variance free world. However, my stats aren’t at a level where it would have been feasible for me to win .3BB/100- 1BB/100. The big pots I lose are destroying me because I’m simply not winning enough small pots. Perhaps this is why variance kills me to a point where I flip out and question my life (aka last weekend). I don’t have enough that’s helping me make up for the variance and cover my losses (aka 3-betting higher, or increasing the VPIP and PFR enough).
Comparison of Different Styles (Short Stack)
By style I’m referring to VPIP, PFR, and 3-bet%. Playing a different style from the “norm” will not necessarily kill you. Your style should generally help play to your strengths. However, if you vary drastically from the norm you have to recognize that you could be playing less than optimally. For example, there is no amount of skill that is going to save your ass if you play a 30/20/10 style on a full ring micro-stakes game.
I have always been more of a nit player, I recognize this. I like the idea of simply waiting a little longer to get in a dominating position based on hand strength alone. It took me a lot of time and study to up my style to a level that is still completely nit even by full ring short stack standards.
Next I want to compare some styles to put things in perspective. I want to compare some very solid short-stackers styles, then some full-ringers. I also want to compare my style to cross reference.
Short-Stackers:
Regular 1) 3 million hands. 11.0/10.8/5.7. Win-rate = 0.31 BB/100
Regular 2) 2 million hands. 11.5/10.9/5.8. Win-rate = 0.25 BB/100
Regular 3) 1.3 million hands. 11.4/10.8/5.9. Win-rate = 1.38 BB/100
Regular 4) 2 million hands. 13.5/11/6. Win-rate= 0.72BB/100
Regular 5) 3 million hands. 9.8/8/5. Loss rate= -.5BB/100
Regular 6) 4.2 million hands. 8.8/6/4.8. Loss-rate = -0.16BB/100
What it Means?
Every known short-stacker who is consistently beating 100NL full ring on Stars has a shockingly similar style. As shown above an 11/10.8/5.7 style is standard. Notice every winning regular above had a 3-bet% of 5.7-6.0% in their millions of hands played. Also, they all had a minimum VPIP of 11% with a PFR% of 10.8%-11.0%. Math can be pretty sick wow. Here we have regulars 1-3 playing millions of hands with nearly identical styles. You will notice this with every short-stacker who has a rate of above .2BB/100 with tons of hands played. Not sure where they all learned this identical 11/10.8/5.7 style, but these players in every sense of the word are: an army of fucking clones.
Meanwhile, I’m around a 9.0/7.8/4 and I have to push myself hard to get my numbers that high. I played on the last few months knowing I was tighter than optimal. I thought I could make up for it with superior table selection. I’ve also been mixing in a hybrid full stack strategy, which makes me tighter. But I can’t find one short-stacker with comparable stats who solidly beats the game. THIS IS A HUGE RED FLAG!
(INSERT RED FLAG HERE)
I found one known short-stack regular with a close style to what I’m playing right now. He is regular 6 above: 8.8/6/4.8 lifetime. He’s played over 4 million hands and has a loss-rate of -0.16BB/100. Is that really the life I want to live during the next year or so? Seriously? The life I want to strive for? I guess 4 million hands proves you can make a decent living doing it, certainly stressful as hell though.
My Options.
1) JOIN THE ARMY OF CLONES? Take a serious step back after hit Supernova in 9 more hours of play. I need to drop tables and teach myself a style that is comparable to the army of clones if I want to continue short-stacking. 11/10.8/5.7
2) Drop to full-buy in poker. Start with $50 buy ins on 20-50BB 100NL tables and 40-100BB 50NL tables.
3) Continue suffering along with a style that MIGHT yield break-even results in the long run.
It is important to note that I am at #3 as I type this sentence. Unfortunately #3 is not an option; it just doesn’t make sense to me anymore. I think rather than choice #1 I would actually be better off dropping to full buy in poker based on my strengths.
Advantages of Full Stack Poker
It seems if I’m going to cut back to ground zero with 1-4 tables until I figure out a style that is acceptable, full stack poker would be the logical choice for me. I think I should go with full-stack as soon as possible for numerous reasons:
1) Table Selection/Idiot-Jacking
This is really my bread and butter strength I think. I’m awesome at table selecting and going after weak players. And yes I’m coining the term “Idiot-Jacking”; I like it more than bum-hunting. I haven’t heard anyone else use this term so I’ll just grab it right here. The problem is that whenever I idiot-jack I usually have a short-stack and don’t win much. It is my natural tendency to stay on a profitable table with weak players, that’s why I kept up with this hybrid short-stack BS even know NO ONE ELSE is doing it. I’m sick of bailing on awesome tables because I have a short-stack.
2) Mastery of One Format.
I wouldn’t be mixing short-stacking with a full-buy in strategy. I should be sticking to one strategy until I get really good at it. Even now I can’t fully analyze my stats because of the mix strategy. I really have no one to compare my stats to because no one is playing a hybrid strategy. It’s just not logical. CHOOSE ARMY OF CLONES OR FULL STACK, NOW!
3) I no longer have a 3-bet Leak
POOF just like that my 3-bet leak is gone. No longer do I have to force myself to jam A7s in a marginal situation because it’s what the army of clones would do (ok fine because it’s a slightly EV play). My current 3-bet of 4% is actually much better than the majority of full buy in players. Forcing myself to 3-bet 5.7% (which I haven’t been able to do) is one of the things I despise when it comes to short-stacking.
4) I know how to exploit short-stack players at the 20-50 BB tables.
I would stick to 20-50 BB tables at 100NL at first. I’m getting an increased rake-back and the action is great on these tables. Not only can I hunt the fish, but I know how to exploit the short-stacking clones that I once considered joining. I know the optimal push ranges based on the math. I know when to re-steal them and make their lives miserable. I’m already liking the sound of this. Also I have reduced competition when I do run into super-fish. It’s going to be me, one other full buy in regular, a few other fish, and short-stackers. I’m liking my odds in this shit-show jungle.
5) Less of a learning curve.
My stats at this moment are comparable to a nitty full stack strategy. I think it makes sense improve my game a little with the reduced tables and work towards a higher potential win-rate. One of the best full-ringers at my stakes has lifetime stats of 11.3/8.8/2.8 with an over 2BB/100 win-rate which is massive. Currently I’m around 9.7/8/4 comfortably. This really isn’t much of a difference. My VPIP would naturally go up a percentage point as I gained more opportunities to stack people based on odds with low-pockets and such. I’m not saying I’m better than the regular I’m comparing to, not even close. The point is that an acceptable win-rate with my current stats is feasible playing full buy in, even with minor adjustments. In contrast, an acceptable win-rate with my current stats is not feasible playing a short-stack based on the evidence I've gathered.
6) I will be a stronger live player.
Yes I’m moving around Atlantic City to play poker for a living. I don’t think I’m going to enter a game at the Borgata with a short-stack. This is a problem I did not consider. It would seem illogical to be grinding online with a short-stack, but then chasing live games with a full one. Fix the problem and choose the full buy in strategy.
Some full ringer styles on my stakes:
Regular 1) 3 million hands. 11.3/8.8/2.8 (2.5 BB/100)
Regular 2) 1 million hands. 10/8/3 (0.63 BB/100)
Regular 3) (8k hands mined at your tables). 9.3/7/3.3 (1.87 BB/100)
ME) 9.7/8/4 (Right now with no adjustments)
Conclusion: Full Stack
Why train myself to join the army of clones for a potential 0.30 BB/100 win-rate (if I MASTER the format)? I could be a non-elite full buy in poker player and still have a rate of 0.50 BB/100. Even right now, with my stats I could still have a win-rate of 0.50 BB/100. Besides, will short-stacking even be around next year? Therefore, I think it’s necessary that I begin working towards a full buy in strategy immediately. I’ve learned a ton short-stacking and don’t feel like I’ve wasted time. I don’t mind using the short-stack to play 16 tables at once to clear bonuses, but not for a full-time career. It's going to take some time dropping back to 4 tables are regrouping, but this is a good time to do it. My summer is already over, I'm not at a level where I can short-stack and make more than my day job, so I'm stuck in corporate another month at least. Also my course is set to move to AC area by October, so I'm not pressured to make online self-sustaining in a week or two. This is a good time to make the change.
I leave you with some key characters to help bring this post to life:
Baglife:

The Red Flag:

The Army of Short-Stack Clones:

-lol bag